Articles Feed

Authors

Categories

Bug free or Free Bugs

by: paul | April 26th, 2009 |

I will not charge a client for a bug fix. Not a penny. If I make a mistake, it is my professional obligation to fix it.

If something doesn’t work with my car, there could be catastrophic consequences, I would be mad unless the company has a solution and offers to fix it for free. As a car owner, I expect nothing less. If a doctor makes a mistake, the patient has the right to sue the doctor for malpractice. Why is it if I make a mistake, I get off scot free? Or worse, I get paid to fix my own mistakes.

I know sometimes the devil is in the details. What is a bug? This is not an easy question to answer, but if there are customer written acceptance tests for the system, the items that fall through are fewer. These are general rules I go by when deciding if something is a bug or not.

One: I made a mistake. These are usually easy to notice, due to the redness in my face when the bug is reported. It is clear to me, I made a mistake, and it is clear I need to fix the bug. It should not cost the customer any money and the process should be transparent.

Two: There is a mistake that both development and the customer team should have caught. A scenario the customer should have specified and during development I should have noticed and brought to their attention. The fault goes on both parties and can be fixed at some version of half price (i.e. every other or a half price story).

Three: The application doesn’t behave correctly due to a missed specification. a scenario that the customer missed or a piece of the business logic that wasn’t fully correct. Almost everyone makes some mistakes. This is not a bug to me, but a feature enhancement. It can be written up as a story and completed.

I think it is important to build faith with the customer that there is a team of developers that are accountable. When you create the culture of accountability, it spreads. The customer team is willing to be accountable when they make a mistake. When no one is afraid to make or admit to a mistake, the projects quality is positively affected. Finally, by taking financial ownership of a bug, I build a trust with my stakeholders of the project.

1 Response to “Bug free or Free Bugs”

  1. John McCaffrey Says:

    I agree with the majority of your post, particularly the classification of bugs (though I tend to put them in the reverse order), and the main message that trust is key, is spot on. I had a similar post about bug classification, and estimation that follows a similar thread of logic http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/05/bugs-cant-be-estimated/

    The part that I differ with you on is if its worth it to change the financial arrangement when there are these kinds of technical problems. The scenario I'm thinking of was related to a 3rd party library not working under a certain case, and while it was definitely a technical bug, we still wanted to treat it with the same prioritization and financial weight as the other work we needed to do. I can appreciate your point, and I find myself applying it whenever I made a 'bonehead' mistake, but for major bugs I treat them as work that needs to be done, and that there may be difficulties in estimation and the customer will have to decide what how they want us to proceed. When it comes to a tight deadline, even 'free' work isn't really free.

Leave a Reply

#